The International Energy Agency (IEA) stated in the World Energy Outlook 2012 that while “taking all new developments and policies into account, the world is still failing to put the global energy system onto a more sustainable path [1].” The United Nations responded to this development and at the Rio+20 Conference in 2012 declared that the green economy should take place “in the institutional framework of sustainable development [2],” and “is an approach to achieving sustainable development [3].” The green economy is now seen as a process for achieving sustainable socio-economic development. The German Institute for International and Security Affairs interprets the green economy as a global concept that “has the potential to function as a central implementation strategy of the guiding principle of sustainable development [4].” And the energy sector is at the centre of this technological transition process [5, 6], as Rifkin argued by supporting the view of UNEP and IEA: “Our industrial civilization is at a crossroads. Oil and the other fossil fuel energies that make up the industrial way of life are sunsetting [5].” Against this background, the integrated assessment (IA) approach is a suitable method for social learning and a tool for supporting the political decision-making process towards a green economy and a sustainable energy system. The IA approach enables us to frame, study and solve issues such as: transformation of the energy system, climate change, water and air quality, land and public health.
To accomplish these targets, in the last decades a wide array of assessment tools has been developed [7-13] and de Ridder et al. have identified seven assessment groups [14]:
The biobased economy is considered as one of the key elements to achieve a smart and green Europe (EU 2020 Strategy; Bioeconomy Strategy to 2030, etc.). To develop a bioeconomy for energy, fuels and biobased products a number of challenges need to be addressed, e.g. the competing uses of biomass, and securing a reliable and sustainable supply of biomass feedstock. Over the last decade, various policies and economic frameworks have been put in place to tackle some of these challenges. But we also have to consider that various policies on EU, national and regional level exist (e.g. in relation to agriculture, forestry, waste, environment, energy, trade) and are playing a role in the bioeconomy. Some may be contradictory and cause confusion and market barriers, thereby prohibiting the efficient development of the bioeconomy. The sustainability of bioenergy has been legally addressed in the EU Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC (RED)[1] and Fuel Quality Directive (FQD)[2] by establishing mandatory criteria, especially for GHG emissions and carbon stocks, but these regulations are restricted to biofuels and liquid bioenergy carriers.
The ultimate goal of a Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS) is to catalyze concrete actions that support development with lower emissions. It should bring stakeholders from government, the private sector and civil society on the same side and eventually lead to greenhouse gas emissions that are lower compared to the situation in which the LCDS process had not been undertaken.
The aim of this Special Session is to help move forward the discussion on LCDS towards a useful climate policy instrument, and attract scientific works that would help addressing the following questions: